Japan Contact Instrumentation Export Division for Showa Measuring Instruments Co., Ltd., Japan |
The History and Early Development of Load Cells
Before strain
gage-based load cells became the method of choice for industrial weighing
applications, mechanical lever scales were widely used. Mechanical scales can
weigh everything from pills to railroad cars and can do so accurately and
reliably if they are properly calibrated and maintained. The method of operation
can involve either the use of a weight balancing mechanism or the detection of
the force developed by mechanical levers. The earliest, pre-strain gage force
sensors included hydraulic and pneumatic designs.
In 1843, English physicist
Sir Charles Wheatstone devised a bridge circuit that could measure electrical resistances.
The Wheatstone bridge circuit is ideal for
measuring the resistance changes that occur in strain gages. Although the first
bonded resistance wire strain gage was developed in the 1940s, it was not until
modern electronics caught up that the new technology became technically and
economically feasible. Since that time, however, strain gages have proliferated
both as mechanical scale components and in stand-alone load cells.
load Cells come of age
Today, except for certain laboratories where precision mechanical
balances are still used, strain gage load cells dominate the weighing industry.
Pneumatic load cells are sometimes used where intrinsic safety and hygiene are
desired, and hydraulic load cells are considered in remote locations, as they do
not require a power supply. Strain gage load cells offer accuracies from within
0.03% to 0.25% full scale and are suitable for almost all industrial
applications.
In applications not requiring great accuracy--such as in bulk
material handling and truck weighing--mechanical platform scales are still
widely used. However, even in these applications, the forces transmitted by
mechanical levers often are detected by load cells because of their inherent
compatibility with digital, computer-based instrumentation. The features and
capabilities of the various load cell designs are summarized in
Figure 7-1.
Figure 1: Load Cell Performance Comparison | |||||
TYPE OF LOAD CELL | WEIGHT RANGE | ACCURACY (FS) | APPLICATIONS | ADVANTAGES | DISADVANTAGES |
Mechanical Cells | |||||
Hydraulic | Up to 10,000,000 lb | 0.25% | Tanks, bins and
hoppers. Hazardous areas. |
Takes high impacts, insensitive to temperature. |
Expensive, complex. |
Pneumatic | Wide | High | Food industry, hazardous areas | Intrinsically safe. Contains no fluids. |
Slow response. Requires clean, dry air |
Strain Gage Cells | |||||
Bending Beam | 10-5,000 lb | 0.03% | Tanks, platform scales, | Low cost, simple construction | Strain gages are
exposed, require protection |
Shear Beam | 10-5,000 lb | 0.03% | Tanks, platform scales, off- center loads |
High side load
rejection, better sealing and protection |
|
Canister | to 500,000 lb | 0.05% | Truck, tank, track, and hopper scales | Handles load movements | No horizontal load protection |
Ring and Pancake | 5- 500,000 lb | Tanks, bins, scales | All stainless steel | No load movement allowed | |
Button and washer | 0-50,000 lb 0-200 lb typ. |
1% | Small scales | Small, inexpensive | Loads must be centered,
no load movement permitted |
Other Types | |||||
Helical | 0-40,000 lb | 0.2% | Platform, forklift,
wheel load, automotive seat weight |
Handles off-axis loads, overloads, shocks |
|
Fiber optic | 0.1% | Electrical transmission cables, stud or bolt mounts |
Immune to RFI/EMI and high temps, intrinsically safe |
||
Piezoresistive | 0.03% | Extremely sensitive,
high signal output level |
High cost, nonlinear output |
Common Questions About Load cells
Q1:
How can load cell designs be distinguished?
A: They can be sorted according to the type of output signal generated (pneumatic, hydraulic, electric) or according to the way they detect
weight (bending, shear, compression, tension, etc.).
Q2:
How do hydraulic load cells work?
A: They are force-balance
devices, measuring weight as a change in pressure of the internal filling fluid.
A load or force acting on a
loading head is transferred to a piston that in turn compresses a filling fluid
confined within an elastomeric diaphragm chamber. As force increases, the
pressure of the hydraulic fluid rises. This pressure can be locally indicated or
transmitted for remote indication or control.
Q3:
How is hydraulic load cell pressure indicated?
A: Pressure can be locally indicated or
transmitted for remote indication or control.
Q4:
Is hydraulic load cell output stable?
A: Output is linear and relatively
unaffected by the amount of the filling fluid or by its temperature. If the load
cells have been properly installed and calibrated, accuracy can be within 0.25%
full scale or better, acceptable for most process weighing applications.
Q5:
When are hydraulic load cells ideal for hazardous area?
A: Because
this sensor has no electric components.
Q6:
Are there any marked disadvantages to using hydraulic load cells?
A: One drawback is that the elastomeric diaphragm limits the maximum
force that can be exerted on the piston to about 1,000 psig. All-metal load
cells also are available and can accommodate much higher pressures. Special
metal diaphragm load cells have been constructed to detect weights up to
10,000,000 pounds.
Q6:
What are some of the typical applications of hydraulic load cells?
A: Hydraulic load cell applications include tank, bin, and
hopper weighing.
Q7:
How can maximum accuracy of hydraulic load cells be attained?
A: The weight of the tank should be obtained
by locating one load cell at each point of support and summing their outputs. As
three points define a plane, the ideal number of support points is three.
Q8:
What is a hydraulic totalizer?
A: It is the area where cell outputs are sent. The totalizer then sums the load
cell signals and generates an output representing their sum. Electronic
totalizers can also be used to attain the same result.
Q9:
How do pneumatic load cells work?
A: Pneumatic load cells operate on a force-balance principle utilizing multiple dampener chambers to provide
higher accuracy than can a hydraulic device. These type of load cells are often used to
measure relatively small weights in industries where cleanliness and safety are
of prime concern.
Q10:
What are a few advantages of pneumatic load cells?
A: The advantages of this type of load cell include their being
inherently explosion proof and insensitive to temperature variations.
Additionally, they contain no fluids that might contaminate the process if the
diaphragm ruptures.
Q11:
Are there any disadvantages to using pneumatic load cells?
A: Yes, they have a relatively slow speed of response and they require
clean, dry, regulated air or nitrogen.
Q12:
What are strain gage load cells?
A: This type of load cell converts the load
acting on them into electrical signals. The gauges are bonded onto a
beam or structural member that deforms when weight is applied.
Q13:
How many strain gages are usually used in testing?
A: Four strain gages are used to obtain maximum sensitivity and temperature
compensation. Two of the gauges are usually in tension, and two in compression,
and are wired with compensation adjustments.
Q14:
What happens when weight is applied to the strain gage?
A: The strain changes the electrical resistance of the gauges in
proportion to the load.
Q15:
How popular have strain gage load cells become in recent years?
A: Most other load cells are becoming obscure. The popularity of
strain gage load
cells is in great part due to their ever-increasing accuracy and lower their unit costs.
Q16:
What are Piezoresistive Sensors?
A: Similar in operation to strain gages, Piezoresistive sensors generate a high level output signal, making them ideal for simple
weighing systems because they can be connected directly to a readout meter. The
availability of low cost linear amplifiers has diminished this advantage,
however. An added drawback of Piezoresistive devices is their nonlinear output.
Q17:
What are Inductive and Reluctance Sensors?
A: These devices respond to the
weight-proportional displacement of a ferromagnetic core. One changes the
inductance of a solenoid coil due to the movement of its iron core; the other
changes the reluctance of a very small air gap.
Q18:
How does a Magnetostrictive sensor work?
A: The operation of this sensor is based on the
change in permeability of ferromagnetic materials under applied stress. It is
built from a stack of laminations forming a load-bearing column around a set of
primary and secondary transformer windings. When a load is applied, the stresses
cause distortions in the flux pattern, generating an output signal proportional
to the applied load. This is a rugged sensor and continues to be used for force
and weight measurement in rolling mills and strip mills.
Q19: Tell me about new sensor
developments?
A: Fiber optic load cells are center stage because of their immunity to
electromagnetic and radio interference (EMI/RFI), suitability for use at
elevated temperatures, and intrinsically safe nature. Two techniques are showing promise: measuring the micro-bending loss
effect of single-mode optical fiber and measuring forces using the Fiber Bragg
Grating (FBG) effect. Optical sensors based on both technologies are undergoing
field trials in Hokkaido, Japan, where they are being used to measure snow loads
on electrical transmission lines.
Q20:
Are any fiber optic load sensors available commercially?
A: Yes. One
fiber optic strain gage can be installed by drilling a 0.5 mm diameter hole into
a stud or bolt, and then inserting the strain gage into it. Such a sensor is
completely insensitive to off-axis and torsion loads.
Q21:
Are any other fiber optic load sensors nearing commercial availability?
A: Yes. Micromachined silicon load cells are well on the path to
realization. It is highly probable that silicon load cells will dominate
the industry in the not-too-distant future.
Q22:
What do you mean by a load cell beam?
A: These refer to the spring elements in a load cell which can respond to
direct stress, bending, or shear. They are usually called by names
such as bending beam, shear beam, column, canister, helical, etc.
Q23:
Which load cell beams are most popular? Q24:
Why is the bending beam sensor popular? Q25:
What are the features of the bending beam sensor? Q26:
How are bending beam sensors used in medical instrumentation, robotics, or
similar low-load applications? Q27:
What are ring or pancake sensors? Q28: What
are sheer beam sensors? Q29: Can you give some details
about Direct Stress (or column/canister) load cells? Q30:
What makes Helical load cells special? Q31: How do Helical load cells
work? Q32: Where can Helical load
cells be mounted? Q33: Is there anything else of
interest about Helical load cells? Q34: How about a few words on
Button and Flat Washer bonded strain gage load cells? Q35: What are the
advantage(s) and disadvantage(s) of using Button and Flat Washer bonded strain
gage load cells?
A: The two most popular designs for industrial weighing applications are the
bending beam and the shear beam cells.
A: Because of its simplicity and relatively low cost.
A: It
consists of a straight beam attached to a base at one end and loaded at the
other. Its shape can be that of a cantilever beam, a "binocular"
design a "ring" design. Strain gages
are mounted on the top and bottom to measure tension and compression forces.
Because the strain gages are vulnerable to damage, they are typically covered by
a rubber bellows. The beam itself often is made of rugged alloy steel and
protected by nickel plating. Bending beam sensor cannot measure shear, because shear stresses
change across the cross section of the cell.
A: Smaller mini-beam sensors are available for measuring loads of up
to about 40 pounds (18 kg). For loads up to 230 grams, the beam is made of
beryllium copper, and for larger loads stainless steel is used. In this design,
strain gages typically are protected by a urethane coating.
A: They are round and flat bending beam sensors consisting of bonded foil strain gages encapsulated in
a stainless steel housing. Its assembly package resembles a flat
pancake. Compression-only sensors can be mounted in a protective, self-aligning
assembly that limits load movement and directs the load toward the center. Compression-tension designs have a threaded hole running completely
through the center of the sensor. Stabilizing diaphragms are welded to the
sensing load button.
A: These sensors measure the shear caused
by a load. The I-beam
construction produces a uniform shear that can be accurately measured by strain
gages. The sensor is provided with a pair of strain gages
installed on each side of the I-beam, with grid lines oriented along the
principal axes. Advantages of a shear beam sensor over a bending beam include
better handling of side loads and dynamic forces, as well as a faster return to
zero.
A: These load cells are essentially bending beam sensors mounted in a column inside a rugged,
round container. The beam sensor is mounted upright, with two of
the four strain gages mounted in the longitudinal direction. The other two are
oriented transversely. The column may be square, circular, or circular with
flats machined on the sides to accommodate the strain gages.
A: These load cells are better able to handle
off-axis loading than are canister-type compression cells.
A: The
operation of a helical load cell is based on that of a spring. A spring balances
a load force by its own torsional moment. The torsional reaction travels from
the top of the helix to the bottom. By measuring this torsional moment with
strain gages mounted on the spring, a helical load cell can provide reasonably
accurate load measurement without the need for expensive mounting structures.
Forces caused by asymmetrical or off-axis loading have little effect on the
spring, and the strain gage sensors can measure both tension and compression
forces.
A: They can be mounted on rough surfaces, even where the
upper and lower surfaces are not parallel, and total error can still remain
within 0.5%.
A: The helical load cell also is resistant to shock and overload (it
can handle a thousand-fold overload), making it ideal for force or load
measurements on vehicle axles, seats, or in forklift applications.
A: They are available in sizes from 1/4 to 1-1/2 in. diameter. The smallest sensors are
available only in compression styles, but some of the larger cells have threaded
holes for also measuring tension. While most of the tiny sensors handle up to
about 200 lb., some are capable of measuring up to 50,000 lb.
A: These
little cells have no fixtures or flexures, off-axis loading and shifting loads
cannot be tolerated. On the other hand, button and flat washer load cells are
extremely convenient and easy to use. Even the smallest sensor is built of
stainless steel, has a built in, full four-arm Wheatstone bridge, and can
measure up to 200 lb. at temperatures up to 1500¡F.
References & Further Reading | |
Omegadyne Pressure, Force, Load, Torque Databook, Omegadyne, Inc., 1996. | |
The Pressure, Strain, and Force Handbook, Omega Press LLC, 1996. | |
Elements of Electronic Instrumentation and Measurements, 3rd Edition, Joseph J. Carr, Prentice Hall, 1996. | |
Industrial Control Handbook, E.A. Parr, Butterworth-Heinemann, 1995. | |
Instrument Engineers' Handbook, Bela Liptak, CRC Press LLC, 1995. | |
Process/Industrial Instruments and Controls Handbook, 4th Edition, Douglas M. Considine, McGraw-Hill, 1993. | |
Van Nostrand's Scientific Encyclopedia, Douglas M. Considine and Glenn D. Considine, Van Nostrand, 1997. | |
Weighing and Force Measurement in the '90s, T. Kemeny, IMEKO TC Series, 1991. |